<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adsense is Effing Alive!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clarifywithben.com/blog/uncategorized/adsense-is-effing-alive/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clarifywithben.com/blog/uncategorized/adsense-is-effing-alive</link>
	<description>Read Ben's Emails Online</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kusuma Widjaja</title>
		<link>http://clarifywithben.com/blog/uncategorized/adsense-is-effing-alive#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Kusuma Widjaja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 12:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarifywithben.com/blog/uncategorized/adsense-is-effing-alive#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Well, I think Scott agenda is that He just want to do 'marketing' effort to popularize click flipping. 1st phase, he let people to download reports free, 2nd phase is also free and just wait for 'adsense' guru to 'reply'.

Joel Comm take that reply...and I think Scott is already know that guy will reply his 2 controvertial reports. And the 3rd report he just show one of the 'Adsense' losers that it's a time for click flipping to come into a solution. He got it man...$1000 up front &#38; $300/month membership times 300 members. Means $90,000 per months.

One thing that click flipping is not the only solution, is that Scott never say that how this business model will last. I think I read "if click flipping is not dead, Adsense won't either". But what about if Google change the policy that it won't display to ads that solely for 'click flippier' schemes next January 2007? That also apply to YPN and other contextual ads...

Well, I think that will become the end of click flippers :) And he already get $90,000/month from members.

The wise thing to think in this game is: "If I were the owner of Adsense, what will it benefit for advertisers &#38; internet search community?" And I think the answer will always giving the best quality information/ads for them. Always think the global picture before join into a scheme...

Well, what do you think about it guys? 

Sincerely
Kusuma</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think Scott agenda is that He just want to do &#8216;marketing&#8217; effort to popularize click flipping. 1st phase, he let people to download reports free, 2nd phase is also free and just wait for &#8216;adsense&#8217; guru to &#8216;reply&#8217;.</p>
<p>Joel Comm take that reply&#8230;and I think Scott is already know that guy will reply his 2 controvertial reports. And the 3rd report he just show one of the &#8216;Adsense&#8217; losers that it&#8217;s a time for click flipping to come into a solution. He got it man&#8230;$1000 up front &amp; $300/month membership times 300 members. Means $90,000 per months.</p>
<p>One thing that click flipping is not the only solution, is that Scott never say that how this business model will last. I think I read &#8220;if click flipping is not dead, Adsense won&#8217;t either&#8221;. But what about if Google change the policy that it won&#8217;t display to ads that solely for &#8216;click flippier&#8217; schemes next January 2007? That also apply to YPN and other contextual ads&#8230;</p>
<p>Well, I think that will become the end of click flippers <img src='http://clarifywithben.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> And he already get $90,000/month from members.</p>
<p>The wise thing to think in this game is: &#8220;If I were the owner of Adsense, what will it benefit for advertisers &amp; internet search community?&#8221; And I think the answer will always giving the best quality information/ads for them. Always think the global picture before join into a scheme&#8230;</p>
<p>Well, what do you think about it guys? </p>
<p>Sincerely<br />
Kusuma</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://clarifywithben.com/blog/uncategorized/adsense-is-effing-alive#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarifywithben.com/blog/uncategorized/adsense-is-effing-alive#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Well I read both copies and also took part in the survey. My experience with adsense is nothing but positive, my revenue from adsense publishing has remained stable and I continue to get the Google electronic tranfer each much. I am not complaining.

I think the ploy that Scott used should be a lesson to all in viral marketing techniques, wish I'd thought of it, he has generated huge interest in his site and whatever he is going to try and flog has a head start.

I think people forget that this is business and all is fair in business.

Just my two cents - back to the factory more adsense sites to put up and promote, the only thing I would say is that I build sites by hand and nurture them along - I don't have 1000's and I earn a good income from Google, Amazon to name two.

Cheers

Mike Russen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I read both copies and also took part in the survey. My experience with adsense is nothing but positive, my revenue from adsense publishing has remained stable and I continue to get the Google electronic tranfer each much. I am not complaining.</p>
<p>I think the ploy that Scott used should be a lesson to all in viral marketing techniques, wish I&#8217;d thought of it, he has generated huge interest in his site and whatever he is going to try and flog has a head start.</p>
<p>I think people forget that this is business and all is fair in business.</p>
<p>Just my two cents - back to the factory more adsense sites to put up and promote, the only thing I would say is that I build sites by hand and nurture them along - I don&#8217;t have 1000&#8217;s and I earn a good income from Google, Amazon to name two.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Mike Russen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buzz in</title>
		<link>http://clarifywithben.com/blog/uncategorized/adsense-is-effing-alive#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>buzz in</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 07:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarifywithben.com/blog/uncategorized/adsense-is-effing-alive#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Hello,
i think what we may know, it's the fact described in these reports are real.
Is smart pricing applicated to all content sites, now ?!
It's the key-motive of these reports. 
Is there now a systematic smart pricing ?
Because he writes that now, the PPC is ridiculous when someone clicks on an ad in a content website instead of clicking on an ad obtained with a search result.
If it is the case, it's at least problematic !
Let see.?I don't refuse immediately the content of these reports. It may be interesting !
Bye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
i think what we may know, it&#8217;s the fact described in these reports are real.<br />
Is smart pricing applicated to all content sites, now ?!<br />
It&#8217;s the key-motive of these reports.<br />
Is there now a systematic smart pricing ?<br />
Because he writes that now, the PPC is ridiculous when someone clicks on an ad in a content website instead of clicking on an ad obtained with a search result.<br />
If it is the case, it&#8217;s at least problematic !<br />
Let see.?I don&#8217;t refuse immediately the content of these reports. It may be interesting !<br />
Bye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Young</title>
		<link>http://clarifywithben.com/blog/uncategorized/adsense-is-effing-alive#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarifywithben.com/blog/uncategorized/adsense-is-effing-alive#comment-104</guid>
		<description>Scott admits in his e-book that his Adsense sites were 'junk' sites and it is not surprising that they got hit.  I agree with his pont on the 'gurus'.  Some of them are still selling 'cookie cutter' programs and sites stuffed with articles from the big article databases ensuring triggering of duplicate content filters in the search engines.

Any sites which do not develop naturally (or look as if they are) and ones which use keyword enhanced content are now going to be spotted by Google, whose bot is now much smarter.  I have  that heard that LSI (Latent Semantic Indexing) is being used to pick up non-natural text.  LSI involves checking the other words near each word and seeing if the proximity of those words fits that found in natural text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott admits in his e-book that his Adsense sites were &#8216;junk&#8217; sites and it is not surprising that they got hit.  I agree with his pont on the &#8216;gurus&#8217;.  Some of them are still selling &#8216;cookie cutter&#8217; programs and sites stuffed with articles from the big article databases ensuring triggering of duplicate content filters in the search engines.</p>
<p>Any sites which do not develop naturally (or look as if they are) and ones which use keyword enhanced content are now going to be spotted by Google, whose bot is now much smarter.  I have  that heard that LSI (Latent Semantic Indexing) is being used to pick up non-natural text.  LSI involves checking the other words near each word and seeing if the proximity of those words fits that found in natural text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spudly</title>
		<link>http://clarifywithben.com/blog/uncategorized/adsense-is-effing-alive#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Spudly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarifywithben.com/blog/uncategorized/adsense-is-effing-alive#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Hi Ben,
Aint controversy WONDERFUL.,..clears the air, steels the mind, clarifies one's goals...Hmmmm exxxcellent.(as Mr.Burns would say)

Scot wanted a buzz. Instead he got a hornets nest. Again I'm sure that's exactly what he wanted.
And Ben it looks as though the hook he thru, well, you bit HARD, and thats great for us 'bottom dwellers', gutter crawlers or WHATEVER Scot called us adsense guys.
Meanwhile us small-fry get to REALLY see where the the cream-on-the-cake lies...Hmmm, Articlesites, thanks a heapo Ben. Pity you're not giving the article site software away. Ahh, just a pipe dream I guess.

Anyway the BIG picture of all this would seem to say, entertain more than one stream of income Adsense, PPC-CPA, etc.
However whereever ones individual dispositions lie then yeahh follow those primarily but do have more than one 'iron-in-the-fire.

Thanks Ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ben,<br />
Aint controversy WONDERFUL.,..clears the air, steels the mind, clarifies one&#8217;s goals&#8230;Hmmmm exxxcellent.(as Mr.Burns would say)</p>
<p>Scot wanted a buzz. Instead he got a hornets nest. Again I&#8217;m sure that&#8217;s exactly what he wanted.<br />
And Ben it looks as though the hook he thru, well, you bit HARD, and thats great for us &#8216;bottom dwellers&#8217;, gutter crawlers or WHATEVER Scot called us adsense guys.<br />
Meanwhile us small-fry get to REALLY see where the the cream-on-the-cake lies&#8230;Hmmm, Articlesites, thanks a heapo Ben. Pity you&#8217;re not giving the article site software away. Ahh, just a pipe dream I guess.</p>
<p>Anyway the BIG picture of all this would seem to say, entertain more than one stream of income Adsense, PPC-CPA, etc.<br />
However whereever ones individual dispositions lie then yeahh follow those primarily but do have more than one &#8216;iron-in-the-fire.</p>
<p>Thanks Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Star</title>
		<link>http://clarifywithben.com/blog/uncategorized/adsense-is-effing-alive#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Star</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarifywithben.com/blog/uncategorized/adsense-is-effing-alive#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Ben,

I strongly hope that you got the point Scott is trying to point out. Too many "gurus" "or "internet marketers" still do not. After one week has passed already.

The average click value per visitor has gone way down after Google implemented Smart Pricing. That is an undisputable fact.

Please read the above two sentences again.

Unfortunately, you have not touched that topic at all yet.

I have to agree with a lot of what was already said above though. The second report ("food chain theory") is one of the best I have ever read as it addresses why many internet marketers fail. They build sites having thousands of pages, using the latest magic page generator of course, do not employ any exit strategies like PHP includes to serve the Adsense code and expect to get rich.

Then average click value drops or Google closes their accounts.

What to do now ? Oh yeah, replace Adsense with Yahoo SM. Please remember we are talking about thousands of pages.

Anyway, being uninformed about CPA networks I will read YOUR report now. 

Keep up the good work, your newsletters are actually worth reading, same goes for the Callen brothers by the way.

Star</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben,</p>
<p>I strongly hope that you got the point Scott is trying to point out. Too many &#8220;gurus&#8221; &#8220;or &#8220;internet marketers&#8221; still do not. After one week has passed already.</p>
<p>The average click value per visitor has gone way down after Google implemented Smart Pricing. That is an undisputable fact.</p>
<p>Please read the above two sentences again.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, you have not touched that topic at all yet.</p>
<p>I have to agree with a lot of what was already said above though. The second report (&#8221;food chain theory&#8221;) is one of the best I have ever read as it addresses why many internet marketers fail. They build sites having thousands of pages, using the latest magic page generator of course, do not employ any exit strategies like PHP includes to serve the Adsense code and expect to get rich.</p>
<p>Then average click value drops or Google closes their accounts.</p>
<p>What to do now ? Oh yeah, replace Adsense with Yahoo SM. Please remember we are talking about thousands of pages.</p>
<p>Anyway, being uninformed about CPA networks I will read YOUR report now. </p>
<p>Keep up the good work, your newsletters are actually worth reading, same goes for the Callen brothers by the way.</p>
<p>Star</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DonOmite</title>
		<link>http://clarifywithben.com/blog/uncategorized/adsense-is-effing-alive#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>DonOmite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarifywithben.com/blog/uncategorized/adsense-is-effing-alive#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Well, Ben, you've had some interesting articles and I for one have learned some stuff from them.  I'm a programmer at heart and not a marketer.  BUT I also know that the "gurus" are hiding more than they are telling.  I know you have pointed this out too.

I have a customer who receives a LOT of traffic to his site.  Lots of good information in his area.  Ranked high (thanks to me) in all the search engines.  But his Google AdSense nets him a piddly $60 or $70/month.  We have done everything everybody has said and just no big break thrus on raking in the money.

So I went looking at the "get rich with no effort" schemes and saw the light bulb about what they are doing.  I tried them too.  I think you said it after I realized it "Why would a hugely successful business reveal their secrets?"  :) You have to buy MY report to know that, if you can't figure it out for yourself.  

All the methods they give tho, will work.  So will AdSense.  But not for 15 minutes a day and not without a LOT of research, testing, etc etc.  Just like any business, it takes a commitment to it to get money out of it.  And the willingness to drop it and move on.

I have not read this report on AdSense and don't plan on it.  I know what he will be saying before reading it and so why bother.  

Keep up the good work tho.  You are one of the few I've seen actually speak the truth behind the curtains on occassion and have had some excellent tips on how to do things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Ben, you&#8217;ve had some interesting articles and I for one have learned some stuff from them.  I&#8217;m a programmer at heart and not a marketer.  BUT I also know that the &#8220;gurus&#8221; are hiding more than they are telling.  I know you have pointed this out too.</p>
<p>I have a customer who receives a LOT of traffic to his site.  Lots of good information in his area.  Ranked high (thanks to me) in all the search engines.  But his Google AdSense nets him a piddly $60 or $70/month.  We have done everything everybody has said and just no big break thrus on raking in the money.</p>
<p>So I went looking at the &#8220;get rich with no effort&#8221; schemes and saw the light bulb about what they are doing.  I tried them too.  I think you said it after I realized it &#8220;Why would a hugely successful business reveal their secrets?&#8221;  <img src='http://clarifywithben.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> You have to buy MY report to know that, if you can&#8217;t figure it out for yourself.  </p>
<p>All the methods they give tho, will work.  So will AdSense.  But not for 15 minutes a day and not without a LOT of research, testing, etc etc.  Just like any business, it takes a commitment to it to get money out of it.  And the willingness to drop it and move on.</p>
<p>I have not read this report on AdSense and don&#8217;t plan on it.  I know what he will be saying before reading it and so why bother.  </p>
<p>Keep up the good work tho.  You are one of the few I&#8217;ve seen actually speak the truth behind the curtains on occassion and have had some excellent tips on how to do things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shimshon</title>
		<link>http://clarifywithben.com/blog/uncategorized/adsense-is-effing-alive#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Shimshon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarifywithben.com/blog/uncategorized/adsense-is-effing-alive#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Ben,

Obviously the title of Scott's download is purely a marketing trick.  He admits himself that AdSense is NOT dead, but that it should be used as icing on the cake, not as the cake itself.

Really what he means is that making AdSense money from garbage sites is (mostly) dead.  This is pretty much true.  He claims that this happened when Google started allowing separate bids for AdSense sites vs. Google search results, but that is not so -- it happened when the search engines started fighting back against all the useless, spammy sites out there by delisting them from their indexes, which took away their free traffic and therefore their revenues.

But I disagree with your response.  We also have made big money for ourselve and our clients with AdSense but we have belatedly realized that building a business with AdSense at its core, rather than as icing on the cake, is a bad business model which will work in the short term only.  

In short, too many web site publishers were blinded by easy money from AdSense.  Many of them filled up the internet with junky sites to everyone's detriment.  But even the serious content publishers fell for the temptation and went for lots of cheap clicks on ads which took visitors away from their sites instead of trying to keep them there and build long-term relationships with them.  Fast money caused many a webmaster to become very short-sighted and that was a big mistake.

We have not dumped our AdSense as we are still addicted to the revenues but we are trying to focus more on capturing email leads and getting visitors to return to our sites rather than focussing on making money from them only once.  We are recommending the same to our clients.

You can see more on this subject at my blog: 

&lt;a href="http://www.webmaster-place.com/blog/2006/08/03/is-google-adsense-going-the-way-of-the-dodo-5.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Is Google AdSense going the way of the Dodo?&lt;/a&gt;.  

I admit that I used the same kind of provocative headline as Scott, but 1) I never said that AdSense is dead, just that there are better ways to make money, and 2) I said it first. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben,</p>
<p>Obviously the title of Scott&#8217;s download is purely a marketing trick.  He admits himself that AdSense is NOT dead, but that it should be used as icing on the cake, not as the cake itself.</p>
<p>Really what he means is that making AdSense money from garbage sites is (mostly) dead.  This is pretty much true.  He claims that this happened when Google started allowing separate bids for AdSense sites vs. Google search results, but that is not so &#8212; it happened when the search engines started fighting back against all the useless, spammy sites out there by delisting them from their indexes, which took away their free traffic and therefore their revenues.</p>
<p>But I disagree with your response.  We also have made big money for ourselve and our clients with AdSense but we have belatedly realized that building a business with AdSense at its core, rather than as icing on the cake, is a bad business model which will work in the short term only.  </p>
<p>In short, too many web site publishers were blinded by easy money from AdSense.  Many of them filled up the internet with junky sites to everyone&#8217;s detriment.  But even the serious content publishers fell for the temptation and went for lots of cheap clicks on ads which took visitors away from their sites instead of trying to keep them there and build long-term relationships with them.  Fast money caused many a webmaster to become very short-sighted and that was a big mistake.</p>
<p>We have not dumped our AdSense as we are still addicted to the revenues but we are trying to focus more on capturing email leads and getting visitors to return to our sites rather than focussing on making money from them only once.  We are recommending the same to our clients.</p>
<p>You can see more on this subject at my blog: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.webmaster-place.com/blog/2006/08/03/is-google-adsense-going-the-way-of-the-dodo-5.html" rel="nofollow">Is Google AdSense going the way of the Dodo?</a>.  </p>
<p>I admit that I used the same kind of provocative headline as Scott, but 1) I never said that AdSense is dead, just that there are better ways to make money, and 2) I said it first. <img src='http://clarifywithben.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A-Z Fotos</title>
		<link>http://clarifywithben.com/blog/uncategorized/adsense-is-effing-alive#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>A-Z Fotos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarifywithben.com/blog/uncategorized/adsense-is-effing-alive#comment-99</guid>
		<description>Honestly, this announcement of the death of Google isn't less trustworthy than most promotional papers in circulation. 

How often havenâ€™t you got your socks blown away - or at least been told that that had happened to the marketer when he tries to persuade you to use his affiliate code. ( I expect I will be able to recognize the most successful marketers from their bare feet !). 

How often haven't you been told that what other gurus are promoting is garbage but this fellow (who happens to be a close friend) owns the truth and can tell you that, if you accept the bargain of what should have been 299.00 dollars, but for a few hours you will -as a personal friend - get it for just 97 dollars.

I am not an expert on Adsense but I try to keep up with the development. What I experience from my own income is that the fluctuating level of the value of clicks on the same website seems to me to be without any sense of rationality.  This apply to my main stock photo website with + 2000 visitors on workdays and for the number of small or very small website I also own.

I have read the two reports by Scott Boulch with great interest and - compared to many other reports and campaigns - I think he knows what he is talking about. I admit that what he is pledging for in the second report seems to be too complicated for my daily life. Probably also economically too risky. But I donâ€™t find any justification for saying it is garbage.

He isn't telling us that it isn't possible to earn some decent money from content rich Adsense websites. But he tells us that it is possible to earn much more on a position higher up in the pyramid.  - I am sure that is a truth.

By the way I am always wondering why people who claim to have the smartest way of generating a lot of income online are taking their valuable time to make instructional material for others. The truth behind that might be that they can beat their previous income generation by moving higher up in the pyramid by activating us on the ground to co-operate with them and to give them our money.

Some thoughts from Ben Schaffer would be greatly appreciated. (I regard you as a very trustworthy colleague, in fact.)

Thanks for your concern.

Best regards
Soren Breiting
A-Z Fotos â€“ www.azFotos.com

PS
I still have to enjoy your recent report.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, this announcement of the death of Google isn&#8217;t less trustworthy than most promotional papers in circulation. </p>
<p>How often havenâ€™t you got your socks blown away - or at least been told that that had happened to the marketer when he tries to persuade you to use his affiliate code. ( I expect I will be able to recognize the most successful marketers from their bare feet !). </p>
<p>How often haven&#8217;t you been told that what other gurus are promoting is garbage but this fellow (who happens to be a close friend) owns the truth and can tell you that, if you accept the bargain of what should have been 299.00 dollars, but for a few hours you will -as a personal friend - get it for just 97 dollars.</p>
<p>I am not an expert on Adsense but I try to keep up with the development. What I experience from my own income is that the fluctuating level of the value of clicks on the same website seems to me to be without any sense of rationality.  This apply to my main stock photo website with + 2000 visitors on workdays and for the number of small or very small website I also own.</p>
<p>I have read the two reports by Scott Boulch with great interest and - compared to many other reports and campaigns - I think he knows what he is talking about. I admit that what he is pledging for in the second report seems to be too complicated for my daily life. Probably also economically too risky. But I donâ€™t find any justification for saying it is garbage.</p>
<p>He isn&#8217;t telling us that it isn&#8217;t possible to earn some decent money from content rich Adsense websites. But he tells us that it is possible to earn much more on a position higher up in the pyramid.  - I am sure that is a truth.</p>
<p>By the way I am always wondering why people who claim to have the smartest way of generating a lot of income online are taking their valuable time to make instructional material for others. The truth behind that might be that they can beat their previous income generation by moving higher up in the pyramid by activating us on the ground to co-operate with them and to give them our money.</p>
<p>Some thoughts from Ben Schaffer would be greatly appreciated. (I regard you as a very trustworthy colleague, in fact.)</p>
<p>Thanks for your concern.</p>
<p>Best regards<br />
Soren Breiting<br />
A-Z Fotos â€“ <a href="http://www.azFotos.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.azFotos.com</a></p>
<p>PS<br />
I still have to enjoy your recent report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://clarifywithben.com/blog/uncategorized/adsense-is-effing-alive#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clarifywithben.com/blog/uncategorized/adsense-is-effing-alive#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Hi, I am new to Internet Marketing. I only have one site and working hard on it in order to monetize it. i donÂ´t know too much about AdSense but from my own and short experience I think this guy scott is right. How can you make huge amounts of money with Adsense while they are paying 5 cents per each click?????

There is another "expert" saying there is no money with Adsense, at adsenserip.com, so scott is not alone as i can see it.

Anyway, iÂ´ll keep my adsense ads on my site to see if i can make some money with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I am new to Internet Marketing. I only have one site and working hard on it in order to monetize it. i donÂ´t know too much about AdSense but from my own and short experience I think this guy scott is right. How can you make huge amounts of money with Adsense while they are paying 5 cents per each click?????</p>
<p>There is another &#8220;expert&#8221; saying there is no money with Adsense, at adsenserip.com, so scott is not alone as i can see it.</p>
<p>Anyway, iÂ´ll keep my adsense ads on my site to see if i can make some money with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
